ارایه یک مدل ارزیابی کارآفرینی سازمانی با رویکرد مدل تعالی سازمانی (EFQM) با استفاده از تکنیک یکپارچه‌سازی دیمتل و فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی (F.D.ANP)
محورهای موضوعی :
کاظم نصیری کاشانی
1
(دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات)
کلید واژه: کارآفرینی سازمانی, مدل تعالی سازمانی EFQM, فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی, دیمتل فازی,
چکیده مقاله :
تغییرات و تحولات پر شتاب دنیای کنونی، نحوه رقابت شرکت‌ها را دگرگون ساخته و ذینفعان سازمانی را در مواجهه با دنيايي پر از چالش قرار داده است. در این محیط پر از تلاطم، كارآفريني سازمانی قابليتي است كه به عنوان پديده‌اي نوين در اقتصاد، مي‌تواند نظام‌هاي امروزي را در اين برهه حساس، نجات داده و نقش موثرتری در توسعه و پيشرفت اقتصادي كشورها ايفا نماید. امروزه مدل‌های تعالی سازمانی نیز از نقش موثری در اشاعه عوامل کلیدی موفقیت سازمانی برخوردارند و بهبود عملکرد را به ارمغان می‌آورند. این مدل‌ها با ارایه معیارهای ارزیابي در دو بخش توانمندسازها و نتایج، خطوط راهنمایي برای سازمان‌ها ایجاد نموده اند تا آنها بتوانند پیشرفت و عملکردهای خود را در زمینه کیفیت و تعالي سازماني اندازه‌گیری نمایند. پس با اتکا بر توانمندسازهای مدل تعالی سازمانی EFQM می‌توان زیرساخت‌ها و قابلیت‌های مورد نیاز کارآفرینی سازمانی را ایجاد نمود. لذا پس از شناسایی عوامل موثر بر پیاده‌سازی کارآفرینی سازمانی، این ویژگی‌ها با توجه به ماهیت‌شان در 4 معیار اصلی "رهبری"، "خط مشی و استراتژی"، "کارکنان" و "شراکت‌ها، منابع و فرآیندها" که همگی از ارکان توانمندساز مدل EFQM است، دسته‌بندی می‌شوند. این مقاله یک روش مدلسازی تحلیلی است که روابط بسیار کیفی میان عناصر کارآفرینی را عملیاتی می‌سازد. جهت تعیین روابط علی و معلولی و ضرایب وزنی اهمیت نسبی هر عنصر در مدل، از رویکرد یکپارچه‌سازی دیمتل‌فازی و مدلسازی فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی استفاده شده است. نتایج حاکی از آن است که در سطح معیارهای اصلی، "رهبری" دارای بیشترین شدت اثرگذاری و معیار "کارکنان" دارای بیشترین ضریب وزنی اهمیت نسبی است. همچنین در بخش زیرمعیارها "حمایت مدیریت ارشد" از لحاظ ضریب وزنی اهمیت نسبی و شدت اثرگذاری رتبه نخست را به خود اختصاص داده است. مدل ارزیابی کارآفرینی سازمانی ارائه شده در پژوهش مدلی جامع است که قابلیت بکارگیری در سازمان‌های مختلف را دارد. این مدل در سازمان توسعه برق ایران مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است.
In today's world, quick changes have varied the competition and also have faced organizational stakeholders with world’s challenges. In this turbulence environment, Intrapreneurship is functionality that can save today's systems as a new phenomenon in the economy at this critical period and play a more active role in economic development. Today, business excellence models also have an important role to deploy the key factors of organizational success and make performance improvements. These models provide the assessment criteria in both enablers and results and make guidelines for organizations to measure their progress and performance in the field of quality and organizational excellence. So it allows creating the needed infrastructure and capabilities for Intrapreneurship based on the EFQM Excellence Model. Therefore, after identifying the effective factors of implementation Intrapreneurship, these features are classified due to their nature at four main criteria include "leadership", "Policy and Strategy", "employees" and "partnerships, resources and processes" that all of them are the enablers of the EFQM model. This paper presents an analytical modeling method that makes practicable a qualitative relationship between the elements of Intrapreneurship. We used the integrated approach of fuzzy Dematel and fuzzy modeling network analysis to determine the relationship and weight relative importance of each element in model. The results indicated “leadership” at the main criteria level has the most highly effect and “employees” has the most important coefficient. Also "senior management support" has the highest importance coefficient and highly effect in the sub-criteria. In this study we presented individual entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurship assessment model that is a comprehensive model and can be used in different organizations and finally we evaluated this model in Iran Power Development Company.
1. Rezaee, R., Gholifar, E., Safa, L., Kazemi, M. (2011). Identifing the development of obstacles Entrepreneurship Partnership in consulting services, engineering and agricultural engineering companies in Zanjan. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, Vol.4 (14), PP.27-46. (In Persian)
2. Kakapour, S., Khonifar, H. (2014). The Study of Relations between Social Skill of Entrepreneurs, Market Orientation and Corporate Entrepreneurship among Knowledge-based Organizations in Tehran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, Vol.7 (2), PP.349-367. (In Persian)
3. Kiani, L., Fazlolah, J. (2015). Strategic role of Business Excellence Model (EFQM) on Individual and institutional Entrepreneurship with MCDM approach. Thesis for Master of Science in Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch. (In Persian)
4. Garavan, T. N. & O’Cinneide, B. (1994). “Entrepreneurship Education and Training Programmes: A Review and Evaluation”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), 3-12.
5. Simsek, Z. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653–662.
6. Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319–340.
7. Ireland, R. D., Webb, J. W. (2009). Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship: Transitioning between exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 52(5), 469–479.
8. Zahra, S. A., Filatotchev, I., Wright, M. (2009). How do threshold firms sustain corporate entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 248–260.
9. Teng, B. S. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource‐based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 119–142.
10. Moghimi, M. (2007) .Corporate entrepreneurship: Obstacles and alternatives (The Case of Industrial Corporations in Iran), Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 1 (2), pp. 87- 119.
11. Kelley, D., Singer, S., Herrington, M. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor: 2011 global report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA), United States, pp. 1- 39.
12. Adab, H., Golavar, M. (2013). Organizational Excellence Assessment Based on EFQM Model - 2010 in National Iranian Gas Company. Journal of Management Studies in Development & Evolution, Vol.22 (70), PP.25-46. (In Persian)
13. Rodríguez, M., Álvarez, M. J. (2014). Does the EFQM Model Identify and Reinforce Information Capability? Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol 109, 716-721.
14. Allur, E. (2010). The Dissemination of the EFQM Self-evaluation Model across Europe. Review of International Comparative Management, 11(5).
15. Salarzehi, H., Hashemi, KH. (2007). Effective Environmental factors on entrepreneurship and providing a model for it. The National Conference of Entrepreneurship, Creativity & Organizations of the Future. (In Persian)
16. Jonker, Jan., Eskildsen, Jacob. (2009). Management Models for the Future. Springer. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Bosma, N. S., Jones, K., Autio, E., Levie, J. (2008), “Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2007 Executive Report”, London, U.K.: London Business School and Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
18. Kuratko, D.F., Morris, M.H., Covin, J.C. (2011). Corporate Innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal South Western Canada, 11(6), 111-135.
19. Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R.D. (2001). “Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validitation”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.16, No. 5, pp.495-527.
20. Simsek, Z., & Heavey, C. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge‐based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small‐ to medium‐sized firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 81–100.
21. Hornsby, J.S., D.F. Kuratko, & Zahra, S.A. (2002). “Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale”. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.17, No.3, PP.253-273.
22. Collins. O., Moore D. (1970). The Organization makers: a behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: PrenticeHall.
23. Susbauer, J. (1973). Intracorporate Entrepreneurship: Programs in American Industry. Cleveland: Cleveland State University.
24. Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
25. Fry, F. (1993). Entrepreneurship: A planning approach. United States: South-Western Educational Publisher.
26. Moghimi, S.M. (2004). Effective factors on Organizational entrepreneurship in Organizations of Social and cultural services Iranian State agency. Journal of Organizational Culture Management, Vol.2 (3), PP.27-78. (In Persian)
27. Kuratko, D., Hornsby, J. and Bishop, J. (2005), Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions and job satisfaction, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1 (2), pp. 275- 291.
28. Chen, J., Zhu, Z. and Anquan, W. (2005), “A system model for corporate entrepreneurship”, International Journal of Manpower, 26 (6), pp. 529- 543.
29. Scheepers, M., Hough, J. and Bloom. J. (2008), “Nurturing the corporate entrepreneurship capability”, Journal of Southern African Business Review, 12 (3), pp. 50-75.
30. Farsi, Y., Jannesari, S.A., Zamani, M. (2008). Investigating of inter organization entrepreneurship in governmental organizations (case study: Khuzestan). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, Vol.1 (1), PP.169-372. (In Persian)
31. Miles, M., Munilla, S. and Darroch, J. (2009), “Sustainable corporate entrepreneurship”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship and Management, 5 (1), pp. 65- 76.
32. Belousova, O., Gailly, B. and Basso, O. (2010), “A conceptual model of corporate entrepreneurial behavior (Interactive paper)”, Journal of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30 (17), pp. 1- 14.
33. Hosseinpour, D., zareevash.F (2010). Organizational entrepreneurship model (case study Department of Cooperatives of Tehran). Journal of Taavon, Vol.21 (4), PP.27-46. (In Persian)
34. Talaye, GH. (2012). Measurement model Entrepreneurship Partnership According to interorganization indexes and its effectiveness on Entrepreneurship (case study Textile industry Business in Yazd). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, Vol.4 (12), PP.185-203. (In Persian)
35. Testaa, S., frascherib, S. (2015) .Learning by failing: What we can learn from un-successful entrepreneurship education. The International Journal of Management Education. 13(1), PP. 11–22.
36. Ruskovaaraa, E., Pihkala, T., Seikkula-Leinob, J., Järvinenc, M.R. (2015). Broadening the resource base for entrepreneurship education through teachers' networking activities. Teaching and Teacher Education.Volume 47, April, PP 62–70.
37. Esmaeil Pour, R. Ramezanian, M.R., Besarati, E., (2014). Review the styles of customer knowledge management in order to select the most appropriate style. Applied mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology. (Feb. 2014):284-296
48. Nasiri, K.K., Modiri, M., Hashemzadeh, G., (2015). A fuzzy analytic network process (F.ANP) based assessment model to establish lean enterprise transformation, Thesis for Master of Science in Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch. (In Persian)
39. Omaskaran. (2006), Research Methods in Management, Translated by: Saebi, M and Shirazi, Tehran: Higher Education and Research Institute of Management and Planning. (In Persian)
40. Mehregan, M.R., (2013). Advanced Operations Research. Publisher: Entesharate ketab daneshjoyee. (In Persian)
41. Wu, W.W., Lee, Y.T., (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method, Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
42. Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W., (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044.
43. Hsu, C.Y., Chen, K.T., Tzeng, G.H., (2007). FMCDM with fuzzy DEMATEL approach for customers’ choice behavior model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9 (4), 236–246.
44. Lin, C.J., Wu, W. W., (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 205-213.
45. Jeng, D.J.F., Tzeng, G.H., (2012). Social influence on the use of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Revisiting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62, 819–828
46. Wei, P. L., Huang, J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Wu, S. I. (2010). Causal modeling of webadvertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9(5), 799–829.
47. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G. H. (2003). Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(5), 635–652.
48 .Saaty, T. L., (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
49. Cil, I., Turkan, Y.S., (2013). An ANP-based assessment model for lean enterprise transformation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64:1113–1130.
50. Uygun, O., Kacamak, H., Kahraman, U.A., (2014). An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers & Industrial Engineering. Volume 86, August 2015, Pages 137–146
51. Leung, L.C., Cao, D., (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. Europen Journal of Operational Reasearch, 124(1)
52. Chang, D.Y., (1996(. Theory and Methodology Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
53. Chen, J.F., Hsieh, H.N., Do, Q.H., (2015). Evaluating teaching performance based on fuzzy AHP andcomprehensive evaluation approach. Applied Soft Computing 28, 100–108.
54. Chang, D.Y., Zhu, k.j., Jing, Y., (1999). A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 116, 450-456.
55. Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 171, 390–411.
56. Yüksel, I., Dağdeviren, M., (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 1270–1278.
57. Wang, Y., Jung, K.A., Yeo, G.T., Chou, C.C., (2014). Selecting a cruise port of call location using the fuzzy-AHP method: A case study in East Asia. Tourism Management, 42, 262-270.
58. Gogus, O., Boucher, T.O., (1998). Strong transitivity and weak monotonicity in fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94, 133-144.