Comparative Study of System Thinking / Soft Operations and Systems Architecture
Subject Areas :Mohamad Reza Mehregan 1 , Mohammad Aboie Ardakan 2 , mitra fahimi 3 *
1 - Tehran University
2 - Tehran University
3 - University of Tehran
Keywords: Soft system thinking , Soft operations research , Architecture, ,
Abstract :
System thinking / Operational research and systems architecture are two areas of complexity management that have been highly sought after by various scholarly scholars. Although systems architecture is considered to be the dominant approach to system thinking / operational research in dealing with complex issues, there is no theory or process for architectural creation. Architecture is the science and art of planning and constructing structures. On the other hand, soft system thinking / soft operations research and structured methods to the problem, with the aim of learning and defining the problem with the help of stakeholders, is seeking satisfactory answers. In this study, by comparing the philosophical foundations of both areas at the methodological level, we would show the usefulness of the system / system research approach in soft operations in order to create a theory for architecture / system architecture. So, in the first step, the architectural mastery / system architecture and system thinking / research in soft operation were extracted and then compared on the basis of the Hamilton logic.
[1] Dickerson, Charles, Mavris, Dimitri N, 2010.Architecture and principles of systems engineering. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
[2] Eisner, Howard, 2005. Managing Complexity Systems. New Jersey: A John Wiley & Sons.
[3] Haskins, Cecilia, Forsberg, Kvin, Krueger, Michael, 2007. Systems Engineering. International Council on Systems Engineering.
[4] Kelley, David, 2014. The art of reasoning. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[5] Maier , Mark W, Rechtin, Eberhardt, 2009. the art of systems architecting. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC.
[6] Mingers, John, 2011. Soft OR Comes of Age – But Not Everywhere!.Omega , 39 (6), 729–741.
[7] Munro, I, and J Mingers, 2002. The use of multi methodology in practice results of a survey of practitioners. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, 369-378.
[8] ORSSA: The Operations Research Society of South Africa At the fore front of Analytics in Africa, 2014. http://www.orssa.org.za/wiki.
[9] Paucar-Caceres, Alberto, 2010. Mapping the changes in management science: A review of `soft' OR/MS articles published in Omega (1973–2008). Omega, 38, 46-56.
[10] Pidd, Michael, 2004. Systems modelling: theory and practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
[11] Rechtin, Eberhardt, 1991.Systems architecting; creating and building complex systems. New Jersey: P T R prentice Hall.
[12] Ritchey, Tom, 2013. Modelling Social Messes with Morphological Analysis. Acta Morphologica Generalis, 2 (1), 1-8.