Investigating the role of telegram user membership with personality traits, social identity and social standards (Case study, students of Sistan and Baluchestan University)
Subject Areas :vali mohammad darini 1 , ehsan namdar joyami 2 *
1 -
2 -
Keywords: Telegram usage, personality traits, social identity, social standards,
Abstract :
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of telegram user contribution with personality traits, social identity and social standards among students of Sistan and Baluchestan University. In this regard, and in order to examine this, in general seven hypotheses have been developed that all the assumptions were approved. The present study is a descriptive-survey method in terms of purpose and according to the method of data collection. The statistical population of this research is the students of Sistan and Baluchestan University. Simple cluster sampling is simple. The sample size is 376 people based on the Cochran formula. Smart PLS research data analysis software. Validity and reliability of research questionnaires have been confirmed. The findings indicate that the use of telegram has a positive and significant relationship with personality openness, consistency, subjective norms, group norms (social identity), and emotional stability, extraversion, moral conscience has a negative and significant relationship. The results indicate that the use of telegram with personality traits and social identity and social standards in various dimensions has a positive and negative relationship between constructive and destructive.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 125–128.
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A metaanalytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 331-341.
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166–179.
Butt, S., & Phillips, J. (2008). Personality and self-reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 346–360.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Livi, S. (1994). Mapping personality dimensions in the big five model. European Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 9–16.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The big five questionnaire: A new questionnaire for the measurement of the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281–288.
Doornwaard, S.M., Moreno, M.A., van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M., Vanwesenbeeck, I., & ter Bogt T.F.M. (2014). Young Adolescents’ Sexual and Romantic Reference Displays on Facebook.
Kelman, H.C. (1974). “Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization”, in Tedeschi, J.T. (Ed.), Perspectives on Social Power (pp. 126-171). Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Addiction to social networks on the Internet: A literature review of empirical research. International Journal of Environment and Public Health, 8, 3528–3552.
Lee, Z.W.Y., Cheung, C.M.K., & Thadani, D.R. (2012). An Investigation into the Problematic Use of Facebook, 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Moreau, A., Laconi, S., Delfour, M., & Chabrol, H. (2015). Psychopathological profiles of
adolescent and young adult problematic Facebook users. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 64-69.
Pantic, I., Damjanovic, A., Todorovic J., et al. (2012). Association between online social networking and depression in high school students: Behavioral physiology viewpoint. Psychiatria Danubina, 24, 90–93.
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2013). Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 315–340.
Prinstein, M. J. & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York, USA: Guilford.
Rosen, L.D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L.M., & Cheever N.A. (2013). Is Facebook creating ‘‘iDisorders’’? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1243–1254.
Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J.M., Simmering, M.G., & Orr, R.R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578– 586.
Ryan, T., Chester, A., Reece, J., & Xenos, S. (2014). The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3, 133–148.
Satici, S.A., & Uysal, R. (2015). Well-being and problematic Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 185–190.
Tajfel, H. (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.
Zhou, T. (2011). Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective. Internet Research, 21, 67–81.