واکاوی شاخص های نوآوری بخشی صنعت خودرو در راستای کاهش شکاف و توسعه نظام نوآوری (مطالعه موردی : گروه صنعتی ایران خودرو )
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت تکنولوژی
علی اکبر مظلومی ابوخیلی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری گروه مهندسی دانشگاه پیام نور صنایع دانشگاه پیام نور)
علیرضا علی احمدی
2
(دانشکده مهندسی صنایع دانشگاه علم و صنعت)
غلامرضا اسماعیلیان
3
(گروه مهندسی صنایع دانشگاه پیام نور)
کلید واژه: نظام نظام نوآوری بخشی , صنعت خودرو , ارزیابی شاخص های نوآوری , مطالعه موردی ,
چکیده مقاله :
دراین تحقیق سعی گردید تا ضمن آشنایی مختصر با صنعت خودرو و مبانی و شاخص های نوآوري بخشی در یکی شرکت خودرو سازی شکاف توانمندی نوآوری بین سطح مطلوب و وضع موجود تعیین گردد. تا با این آگاهی فرصت هایی براي رشد و توسعه صنعت خودرو فراهم شده و بتوان براي برون رفت از بحرا ن و رکود در این صنعت پیشنهاداتی ارائه داد . باید توجه داشت که بخش های مختلف صنعتی در عین حالی که شباهت هایی با هم دارند، دارای ویژگیها و مختصات متفاوتی هستند و مطالعات نوآوری در بخش های صنعتی باید با لحاظ کردن این تفاوت ها انجام شود. این پژوهش از جنبه اهداف ، کاربردي بوده و با توجه به حضور محقق در این صنعت و استفاده از پرسشنامه در داخل سازمان از حیث روش پیمایشی و از نوع میدانی و مطالعه موردی می باشد.محقق در پی مفهوم سازی و پاسخ به اين سئوال است كه «وضعیت شاخص های ایجاد توانمندی نوآوری بخشی در صنعت خودرو چه هستند و فاصله این شاخص ها از سطح مطلوب به چه میزان میباشد؟.نتایج بدست آمده از این تحقیق نشان میدهدکه در چند سال اخیر روند بکار گیری نوآوري در این صنعت خودرو ایران رو به کاهش نهاده است و سطح نوآوري سازمانی در حد موثري نمی باشد. لذا تغییر سیاست گذاری و ساختار سازمانی موجود شرکت های خودرو سازی بویژه در سیستم نوآوری وتحقیق و توسعه و تغییرات در فرهنگ و نگرش هاي مدیران ،براي حرکت به سمت بکار گیری شاخص های موثر نوآوری و فناوری ضروري است.
In this research, while briefly getting acquainted with the automotive industry and the principles and indicators of innovation in a car manufacturing company, it was tried to determine the innovation capability gap between the desired level and the current situation. With this awareness, opportunities are provided for the growth and development of the automotive industry and suggestions can be made to get out of the crisis and recession in this industry. It should be noted that different industrial sectors, while having similarities, have different characteristics and coordinates, and innovation studies in industrial sectors should be done taking into account these differences. This research is applied in terms of objectives and according to the presence of the researcher in this industry and the use of questionnaires within the organization in terms of survey method and field type and case study. The researcher seeks to conceptualize and answer this question that "What are the indicators of innovation capability in the automotive industry and what is the distance between these indicators and the desired level?" The results of this study show that in recent years, the trend of applying innovation in this automotive industry in Iran is Has decreased and the level of organizational innovation is not effective. Therefore, changing the existing policy and organizational structure of car companies, especially in the system of innovation and research and development and changes in the culture and attitudes of managers, is necessary to move towards the use of effective indicators of innovation and technology.
Ajdari, Ali Asghar and Shojaei, Saeed. (1394). Analysis of the IRANs automobile industry and providing solutions to overcome the existing challenges in line with the general policies of the resistance economy. Available on the website of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (In Persian)
Bergek, A., et. al. (2005, May). Analyzing the Dynamics and Functions of Sectoral. Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005, Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Boroumand, Mujtaba and Ranjbari, Maryam (1388). Strategic measures of human resource management and innovation performance with emphasis on the role of knowledge management. Police Human Development Monthly, No., 24 pp. 41. (In Persian)
Breschi, S., and Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral Innovation Systems. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 209-226.
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Bierly, (2001). Paralyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 118-107,18.
Green, Josephine, (2005). "Foresight's Contribution Towards Co-Designed Future", Keynote presentation, The 7th Annual Conference on Foresight Management in Corporations and Public Organizations, Helsinki.
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of evolutionary economics, 1(2), 93- 118.
Khamseh, Abbas, Jalali, Fatemeh, (2013). Measuring Levels of Innovation Capability in Steel Industry, International Conference on Management, Challenges and Solutions. (In Persian)
Kim, L. and Nelson, R, (2008). Technology, Learning & Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kim, Linsu, (1999). "Building technological capability for industrialization: analytical frameworks and Korea's experience. “Industrial and corporate change 8.1 p:111-136.
Krishnan, H.A., (2001). “Supplier Selection Practice among Small Firms in the United States: Pharmaceutical Industries (1981- 1997)”, Research Policy,33(10), pp.287-321.
Kuratko, D. F. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship: An introduction and research review. In Z. J. Aces & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction (2nd ed., pp. 129–164). New York: Springer Publishers.
Laursen, Keld and Salter, Ammon, (2004). Open for Innovation, The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing firms; DRUID/Copenhagen Business School.
Lee, K., and Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up Cycles and Changes in Industrial Leadership: Windows of Opportunity and Responses of Firms and Countries in the Evolution of Sectoral Systems. Research Policy,46(2), 338-351.
Majles Research Center, Deputy of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs (2016). A comparative study of the automotive industry in different countries of the world. (In Persian)
Majles Research Center, Deputy of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs (2016). World Automotive Industry Outlook 2016 Mackenzie Global Institute Report on "Automotive Industry Horizon 2030”. (In Persian)
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production. Research Policy, 31, 247-264
Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malerba, F., and Mani, S. (2009). Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production in Developing Countries. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar
Malerba, F., and Nelson, R. (2011). Learning and Catching up in Different Sectoral Systems: Evidence from Six Industries. Industrial and Corporate Change,20(6), 1645-1675.
McAdam Rodney et al, (2007) "Implementing innovation management Manufacturing SMEs :a longitudinal study", Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 385-403.
Ministry of MIM, Office of Energy, Industry and Mining Studies (1396). World Automotive Industry Outlook in accordance with 2030 (Lessons for the Iranian Automotive Industry) Deputy Minister of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs. (In Persian)
North, D. C. (١٩٩٠). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373.
Porter, M. E. & C. Van Der Linde (1995), "Green & Competitive: Ending the Stalemate", Harvard Business Review, September–October, PP. 120–134.
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Ghazi Nouri, S. (1398) The role of policies, science, technology and innovation in the development of sectoral systems. (In Persian)
Shahabadi, Abolfazl. Ahmadi Roshan, Zahra (2010). Investigating the Determinants of Innovation (Case Study of Countries) D8 Second National Conference on Creativity, TRIZ and Engineering and Innovation Management in Iran. (In Persian)
Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture (2015). Automotive and parts industry in Iran "during the years to 93”. (In Persian)
Wells, P., & Nieuwenhuis, P. (2012). Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1681-1692.
Wongling piyarat, J., (2004) "The Use of Strategies in Managing Technological Innovation". European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3): 229-250.