چرخه حیات پروژه کنترل آلودگی هوا شهر تهران: رویکرد تحلیل ذینفعان کلیدی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت استراتژیک
مجتبی دشتی
1
*
,
میثم شهبازی
2
,
عادل آذر
3
,
محمد حسن ملکی
4
1 - دانشگاه تهران
2 - پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران
3 - تربیت مدرس
4 - دانشگاه قم
کلید واژه: چرخه حیات پروژه کنترل آلودگی هوا تحلیل ذینفعان روش دلفی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: هدف این تحقیق تجزیه‌وتحلیل ذینفعان کلیدی پروژه کنترل آلودگی هوا شهر تهران در طول چرخه حیات پروژه است. روش: این تحقیق از نوع کیفی می‌باشد پس از انجام مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و جمع‌آوری ادبیات موضوعی تحقیق، بازيگران پروژه کنترل آلودگی هوا شهر تهران شناسايي شد و خروجی‌های به‌دست‌آمده با استفاده از روش دلفی تحلیل گردید. پس از انجام روش دلفي، بازيگران كليدي تعيين و به وسيله ماتريس قدرت – علاقه در طول چرخه حيات مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته‌ها: در این پژوهش 12 بازيگر كليدي در بين 23 بازيگر شناسایی‌شده انتخاب گرديدند كه عبارت‌اند از: «وزارت صنعت، معدن و تجارت»، «سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست»، «سازمان صداوسیمای جمهوری اسلامی»، «سازمان ملی استاندارد ایران»، «شرکت کنترل کیفیت هوای شهر تهران»، «معاونت حمل‌ونقل و ترافیک شهرداری تهران»، «سازمان‌های بیمه‌گر»، «وزارت نفت»، «پلیس راهنمایی و رانندگی»، «خودروسازان»، «وزارت بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی»، «سازمان حفاظت از محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار شهرداری تهران». نتیجه‌گیری: در این پژوهش بازیگران کلیدی در هر مرحله از چرخه حیات پروژه تغییر می‌کند و این در حالی است که در عموم پژوهش‌های مشابه این تغییر اساسی در طول زمان اجرای یک پروژه نادیده گرفته شده است. همچنین با بررسی اسناد رسمی، قوانین، طرح‌ها و استراتژی‌هایی که در گذشته به منظور حل بحران آلودگی هوا تدوین گردیده است مشخص شد «سازمان‌های بیمه‌گر»، به عنوان یک بازیگر کلیدی در حل این بحران نادیده گرفته شده است.
Objective: This research aims to analyse key stakeholders in Tehran air pollution control project during its life cycle. Methods: Since the research is qualitative, after librarian research and gathering research literature, the actors of Tehran air pollution control project were recognized and the outputs analyzed using Delphi method. Key actors were determined after Delphi method application and analyzed using power-interest matrix during life cycle. Results: in the present study, 12 key actors identified and selected from 23 actors as follows: “Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade”, “Environmental Protection Agency”, “Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting Organization”, “National Standard Organization of Iran”, “Tehran Air Quality Control Company”, “Deputy of Transport and Traffic of Tehran Municipality”, “Insurance organizations”, “Oil Ministry”, “traffic police”, “Automakers”, “Ministry of Health and Medical Education”, “Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development Organization of Tehran Municipality”. Conclusion: in the present study, key actors changed in each stage of projects life cycle while in almost all similar projects this fundamental change has been ignored in the project run time. also after reviwing formal documents, laws and strategies that have been written for solving air pollution crisis it was found that “Insurance organizations” have been ignored as a key actor in solving this crisis.
Aaltonen, K. (2010). Stakeholder management in international projects.
Aaltonen, K. (2011). Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. International journal of project management, 29(2), 165-183.
Aaltonen, K. (2011). Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. International journal of project management, 29(2), 165-183.
Abtahi, z., khoshnavapour,n., forsatkar, a., abtahi, t. (2104). Key stakeholder analysis using interest-power matrix (case study: development plan of south pars zone) discover & production of oil & gas, 127, 32-39 (in Persian)
Afridi, A. H. (2018). Stakeholders Analysis for Serendipitous Recommenders system in Learning Environments. Procedia computer science, 130, 222-230.
Aragonés-Beltrán, P., García-Melón, M., & Montesinos-Valera, J. (2017). How to assess stakeholders' influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process. International journal of project management, 35(3), 451-462.
Ayatah, A. K. (2012). Examining Stakeholder Management Challenges and their impact on Project Management in the case of Advocacy and Empowerment NGOs in the Upper East Region of Ghana (Doctoral dissertation).
Ballesteros, M. M. (2010). Prospects on Ecological Development in Philippine Cities. In Towards A Liveable And Sustainable Urban Environment: Eco-Cities in East Asia (pp. 179-213).
Browne, N., Robinson, L., & Richardson, A. (2002). A Delphi study on the research priorities of European oncology nurses. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 6(3), 133-144.
Chinyio, E., & Olomolaiye, P. (Eds.). (2009). Construction stakeholder management. John Wiley & Sons.
Elias, A. A. (2016). Analysing the stakes of stakeholders in research and development project management: a systems approach. R&D Management, 46(4), 749-760.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Fry, M., & Burr, G. (2001). Using the Delphi technique to design a self-reporting triage survey tool. Accident and emergency nursing, 9(4), 235-241.
Guide, A. (2001). Project management body of knowledge (pmbok® guide). In Project Management Institute.
Hasanvand, m, s., & naddafi, k. (2013). Air poluters. Articles of air pollution & health. 4th national conference of air&noise pollution. Tehran (in Persian)
Kamali, m., (2014) triple elements of sustainable development, donyaye eghtesad newspaper.3613 (in Persian)
Kendall, J. W. (1977). Variations of delphi. Technological forecasting and social change, 11(1), 75-85.
Lin, C. C., & Chuang, L. (2012). Using fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy AHP for evaluation structure of the appeal of taiwan’s coastal wetlands ecotourism. Business, Economics, Financial Sciences, and Management, 347-358.
Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2014). Stakeholders' power, corporate characteristics, and social and environmental disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 426-436.
McKenna, H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing?. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(6), 1221-1225.
Mohapatra, P. K., Bora, M. C., & Sahu, K. C. (1984). Incorporating Delphi results in system dynamics models: A case of Indian tea industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25(2), 159-177.
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446-457.
Nguyen, N. H., Skitmore, M., & Wong, J. K. W. (2009). Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: a study of perception of project managers in state‐owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1129-1140.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management, 42(1), 15-29.
Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International journal of project management, 23(4), 321-328.
Oliveira, G. F. D., & Rabechini, R. J. (2019). Stakeholder management influence on trust in a project: A quantitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 131-144.
Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of advanced nursing, 41(4), 376-382.
Saghafi, f., abbasi, k., keshtgari, e., (2013). Stakeholder Management and Prioritization Framework (Case Study:Xamin, Native Operating System of Iran). Tomorrow management. (39) 20-42 (in Persian)
Sarmad,z., bazargan, a & hejazi, a. (2018) research methodology in behavioral scince. Agah publications. (in Persian)
Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., & Galal, G. (1999). Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99 (pp. 387-391). Ieee.
Siering, J. U. L. I. A. N., & Svensson, A. D. A. M. (2012). Managing external stakeholder relationships in PPP projects. A multidimensional approach. Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden.
Smith, L. W. (2000). Project clarity through stakeholder analysis. In CrossTalk.
Terstriep, J. (2007). Balance Scorecard, Measuring CM Performance. Europe Innova, Innovation and Clusters, Nice.
Westland, J. (2007). The Project Management Life Cycle: A Complete Step-by-step Methodology for Initiating Planning Executing and Closing the Project. Kogan Page Publishers.
Zou, P. X., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. Y. (2006, January). Identifying key risks in construction projects: life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. In Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference.