Detecting obstacles and chalenges of formation and development of innovation system in Iran’s General Aviation Sector
Subject Areas :
Bahareh
Nabavi
1
(University of Tehran)
Fatemeh
Saghafi
2
(Associate Prof. of University of Tehran )
Manoucher
Manteghi
3
mehdi
Mohammadi
4
(University of Tehran)
Keywords: sect oral innovation system Iran Aviation sector functional structural analysis ,
Abstract :
--
کریمیان، ح. و رمضانی، ر. (1393). ارائه چارچوبی بومی شده برای تبیين وضعیت موجود فناوری تولید برق و حرارت کشور با استفاده از نظام نوآوری فناورانه. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده مهندسی صنایع و سیستمهای مدیریت دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر.
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological forecasting and social change, 74(4), 413-432.
Malerba, F. (2001, September). Sectoral systems of innovation and production: concepts, analytical framework and empirical evidence. In Conference" The Future of Innovation Studies.
Malerba, F. (Ed.). (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research policy, 31(2), 247-264.
Bergek, A., Jacosson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmarki, S., & Rickne, A. (2005). Analyzing The Dynamics and Functions of Sectoral. Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference, (p.3). Copenhagen.Denmark.
Bergek, A. (2002). Shaping and exploiting technological opportunities: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden. Göteborg, Sweden: Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology.
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of evolutionary economics, 1(2), 93-118.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2010). Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A systems of innovation approach. The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook, 95-114.
Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and innovation management studies, 1(1), 73-102.
Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609-619.
Hillman, K. M., & Sandén, B. A. (2008). Exploring technology paths: the development of alternative transport fuels in Sweden 2007–2020. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(8), 1279-1302.
Suurs, R. A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2009). Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1003-1020.
Jacobsson, S. (2008). The emergence and troubled growth of a ‘biopower’innovation system in Sweden. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1491-1508.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sandén, B. A. (2008). ‘Legitimation’and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575-592.
Hellsmark, H., & Jacobsson, S. (2009). Opportunities for and limits to academics as system builders—the case of realizing the potential of gasified biomass in Austria. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5597-5611.
Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39(1), 74-87.
Norman K Danzin, Sociological Method: A Sourcebook. Aldine Transaction, 2006.